On-line Supplement Ch1:
Culture, Choruses, Hymns
Since I teach at Biola University, a large, conservative,
evangelical college in the LA area, I'm in a unique position to get
a "fix" on student opinion regarding worship. The comments below were
gleaned from an assignment requiring first year students to respond
to chapter one of The New Worship. They offer worship leaders and
teachers of worship insight into the level of awareness and the thinking
of college students today. At the end, you will find an amazing response
of one student to a hymn meditation assignment, and a thumbnail sketch
of English Protestant congregational song.
Basic Concepts in Chapter One of The New Worship were
New
Before reading this chapter I had no idea as to the
controversy between hymns and choruses
I had never thought in depth about the difference between
hymns and choruses before reading this chapter.
I had never thought of combining hymns and choruses.
I had always seen churches pick one or the other, as if the two styles
were as unmixable as oil and water. The idea of overcoming polarization
by matching the ratios of choruses to hymns is phenomenal.
I never thought that revising hymns was an option.
I have never considered the content of hymns to be something
thought of as doctrine or theology, but it is true.
I now see that hymns can serve as a wonderful way to
memorize Scripture.
I will no longer think of hymns and choruses with the
same casual approach.
Student Comments on the Stars/Fireworks analogy
Like stars, hymns are not simple or easily replaced.
Hymns are more than a quick thought jotted down on paper.
You can really see in hymns a constant glow of "deep
theological truth." Choruses tend to be more fireworks that explode
before you and send a rush of excitement through your heart and soul.
Stars are constant and reliable. They put me in a reverent mood. They
will always be there for us to gaze on throughout the generations
to come.
Choruses begin strong and soon thereafter fizzle out.
They are enchanting for the moment. They rarely have any lasting quality
to them. I used to sing some songs all the time in high school and
I could not even begin to tell you the names of them because I have
not heard them in so long.
We go to see fireworks for our entertainment. Many of
the choruses we sing complement this mentality.
Choruses, Repetition of Choruses were Defended
I don't see choruses as something that fizzles away
quickly. Perhaps choruses may be shorter and have less history, but
who is to say that God could not work just as powerfully in a person's
life through them. My person experience has been that I can stretch
out my arms before God and pour my everything into His hands during
some of these "fireworks" [choruses] and still be impacted by it today--and
probably even will be for the rest of my life.
Choruses have the unique ability to bring an incredible
amount of emotion out of the most reserved people. The music makes
the singer feel like he/she is really close to God.
With choruses it is easy for me to connect with God.
I may break down and cry when singing a chorus because it is so applicable
and applies to my life.
If an individual only sings something once, the full
meaning becomes hard to understand. But by the repetition I am able
to focus and really comprehend. Repetition allows the meaning to really
permeate into my heart and mind.
When I am in church it is easy to lose attention, but
when we are singing a chorus it becomes quite difficult for my mind
to wander.
I can easily recollect a chorus but it's harder to remember
a hymn.
Retention is really important. It is far better to go
into worship and experience God and leave worship with a new worship
chorus and with applicability brought to one's life. Choruses bring
me to the core and foundation of my belief in Christianity and everything
I face on a daily basis.
When I worship I feel like nothing can touch me and
all I have left is the knowledge and comfort of Jesus. I have really
come to love the simplicity and truth of choruses. I really believe
the heart of worship is simply to return to what the basic truths
of Christianity are.
Choruses send a rush of emotions that many times I cannot
control myself...choruses send me on an emotional roller coaster and
tend to be more convicting of sin....
Why should the church be stuck in the 19th century while
the rest of the world progresses into the 21st just because we prefer
to hang onto our preferred style of worship? We will reach many more
people through our church services if we are giving them styles of
music they enjoy and that are similar to those they listen to on the
radio, as opposed to the ancient tunes that help give church the stereotype
of being "out-dated."
Lack of Exposure to Hymns, Separate Services, Short
Attention Spans
Hymns are almost a forgotten form of worship. At my
church, which I have been going to since I was 19 years old, we have
sung strictly contemporary style worship. I do not think that there
was ever a time as far as I know that we sang a hymn other than Amazing
Grace (every once in a while).
I was amazed to learn that many of my friends do not
sing hymns at all.
Youth often have their own service. The youth service
I go to has almost no hymns. We do one every couple of months.
Many young people see the elderly as a nuisance.
Most often people my age do not want to even give hymns
a chance. Too often I have been the lone champion.
The church I grew up in as a child has always sung more
choruses than hymns (about 90% to 10%) for as long as I can remember.
For 11 years growing up there I don't remember a time I sang out of
a hymnal. We came to an agreement, long ago, that we would have a
service dedicated to a more traditional style of worship. Eventually
we did away with that, and I am not sure why.
I am going to be very blunt. I believe the reason we
cannot appreciate hymns today is because our attention spans are so
blown out of proportion. We listen to something for about ten seconds
and if it does not entertain us, then we tune it out or just plain
don't like it.
Trouble Understanding and Appreciating Hymns
Usually I'm distracted by the slow pace of hymns. I'm
paying too much attention to the music to notice the wonderful theological
value in the lyrics.
I would always sing the hymns [as a teenager] but never
really thought of the words. I also never saw the church people enjoying
worship.
I remember when I was in Jr. High. I really did not
know what I was singing. I would look up at the screen and sing as
loudly as I could, but rarely would understand the meaning of the
words that would come out of my mouth. And those songs were just simple
choruses. Can you imagine how hard it would have been for me to understand
hymns
The lyrics of the hymns confuse me and seem to distract
me. I like to close my eyes in worship in order to remove as many
distractions as possible. However, whenever a hymn is sung, not only
do I have to open my eyes to read the lyrics, but I am constantly
fumbling to find my place in the song. Then, when I do find my place,
I'm so busy trying to figure out what the words mean, I barely worship.
With hymns, so much emphasis is placed on the words
that much of my worship dwindles. I do like the fact that hymns have
a deep meaning in the lyrics. However, I would have to study them.
Worship is obviously not the appropriate time to study something.
I do not like most hymns because of two reasons. One,
I have not heard them sung in a way that seemed it was a true expression
of worship. Two, the music is too droning, which causes the person's
mind to wander. But these two factors should not keep the Church from
singing hymns.
Ideas for Overcoming Polarization
[Leaders can appeal to the college student's sense
of family]
Hymns are often a reminder of what God has brought my
family through. My grandmother can teach me a song which I have never
heard, and relate an event or time in her walk when it was particularly
meaningful. It would hurt me deeply if my grandmother could not participate
in a worship service as fully as she is capable because of songs [choruses]
she is unfamiliar with. Many of the hymns she knows are written on
her heart and she does not need the hymnal to express what she sings
from within her soul. If we disregarded hymns, it would be as if I
disregarded and disconnected myself from the faith of my mother and
grandmother.
In my church, when elders pray and lay hands on a high
school team going on a mission's trip, it helps break down polarization.
Since being in college I have benefited greatly from
singing a combination of hymns and choruses. I wish more churches
could recognize that there could be a compromise. I find myself wanting
to sing hymns more because I realize the only reason I didn't enjoy
them was because of the music issue. Now I see it is deeper than that.
It has caused me to take a step back at my worship patterns and understand
worship in a fuller light.
Criticisms of Choruses
Choruses are very good at making us feel happy or excited
or even grateful, but sometimes they manipulate us to believe that
the Holy Spirit is working within us, when many times we are just
fooling ourselves. For example, if we sing "Thank-you Lord" over and
over again, of course we will eventually start to feel thankful, but
for what? Many emotions without any biblical truth is dangerous.
Choruses give people a feeling of happiness and elation.
However, the feelings they feel quickly subside and they are left
with nothing to contemplate when the song ends.
I like it when I go into the church service and sing
songs that don't sound just like the songs we listen to on the radio.
It gives the songs a feel of something different--something special--
set apart from the music that the rest of the world listens to. And
I think that in this day and age, the church can use all the help
it can get to be set apart from the world. I'm not discounting the
style in which choruses are sung, I just dislike it when the style
in which hymns are sung is dismissed as "out-dated." I believe just
the opposite--hymns have an enduring quality that includes both the
words and the form. I realize that this is merely my own opinion,
but so is saying that singing hymns automatically makes the church
"stuck in the 19th century."
I would disagree with the statement that there is no
"sacred" style of worship. Christians today have made worship such
a subjective thing. Examine the Old Testament and see the rigid step
by step requirements God lays out in Leviticus for the Israelites
in worshiping Him. God in essence said, "This is how I want you to
worship Me, whether or not you feel as if this will connect you intimately
to Me." While He does not still hold us to these same rigid requirements,
God is the same God the Israelites worshiped then as we worship now.
Obviously, God sets standards and we need to conform to the Biblical
requirements.
Where do we start drawing the line between the outdated
and in vogue? Are we saying that we can't look at some hymn or chorus
that is ten years old, twenty years old, and thirty years old? Hymns
have value because of what they are saying. They deal with theological
issues that the church has confronted over the years and answered,
if we ignore them then we could lose one of the most priceless treasures
our Christian forefathers have given us--the wisdom of their experience.
Growth & Worship
I look forward to every chance I get to worship during
the week. After having my devotions, I love to end on a good note
with a hymn or chorus.
I never saw the people at my church enjoying worship.
I remember starting high school and going into the youth group standing
in worship with my hands in my pockets and being "cool" and not singing.
As I matured in Christ, though, I began to sing. Some of those first
songs are now very dear to my heart. I also remember raising my hands,
standing, bowing down in prayer while the worship leader and others
sang. These were the times I could genuinely see spiritual growth
in my life. More recently I have found a new love for hymns. I think
I always disliked hymns because I couldn't understand them. Now reading
or singing them brings a new feeling of worship.
Most Students felt the Chapter was Fair--But not All!
It was refreshing to hear a well-thought-out, non-attacking
view on this topic. I heard a professor from another Christian university
say that choruses were Satan's way of infiltrating the church. And
I've heard younger students mock hymns and make fun of them.
The chapter was very one-sided that hymns are better
than choruses. Dr. Liesch said, "Choruses often shortchange the full
reality of sin and weakness and fail to capture adequately the agony
and suffering of Christ on the cross." I do not feel this is an accurate
statement. And I do not feel it is appropriate to make such a generalization
and speak for the entire population of choruses.
The Results of a Hymn Meditation Assignment
Here is the amazing, unedited response I received
from a first year student who did a hymn meditation assignment. I
instructed the students to arrive at church 20 minutes early for two
Sundays and meditate on a Watts, Wesley, or Crosby hymn/gospel song
and then submit a one page report of their experience for credit.
"When I first heard of this project, I thought that
the impact of reading a few hymns would be rather pointless. I never
realized what treasures hymns actually were and how they are truly
rich in theology and spirituality.
I generally look at hymns as ancient songs that my grandmother likes
to sing off key. They tend to sound dry and boring, and therefore
when I hear them my mind turns off because I'm not stimulated in any
way.
However, when I decided to do this assignment, my eyes were literally
opened! First of all, I had to bring a hymn book to church because
my church does not have any. So, when I came to church two weeks ago
a half an hour early, I came with my own hymn book (from home) and
began to read. Immediately I began to see how my heart was set on
my preconceived idea of what hymns were = boring. Then I realized
what it was that I was actually singing. I was amazed at how rich,
doctrinally some of the hymns truly were. For example, Blessed Assurance
completely discusses our atonement, justification and rapture. That
= amazing.
I also had a prejudgment that hymns were rather impersonal and lacking
in spiritual intimacy. Then last week, as I read through "Close to
Thee" and "Draw Me Nearer" by Fanny Crosby, my soul was deeply moved
to the point of tears. These were beautiful lyrics, full of emotion
and tender passion for our Lord. I was completely enamored by these
hymns and how personal and glorifying they were unto the Lord. I honestly
have to admit that each time I meditated upon these hymns, my heart
was quieted and focused for the actual service. I truly had never
been so prepared for a service nor so blessed by a service because
of my heart of meditation. This was quite a touching experience, thank
you! :)"
A Thumbnail History of English, Protestant Congregational
Song
In chapter one, I refer to the fact that Protestants
are a people of two books, the Bible and the hymnbook. However, it's
a little more complicated than that historically. Soon after Luther
posted his 95 theses on the Wittenberg door in 1517, signaling the
beginning of the Protestant Reformation, he began to promote arduously
the creation of original hymns lyrics in the German language. This
gradually led to a rich hymnody of songs in the German language and
eventually, the widespread use of full-time, church music directors
like J. S. Bach in the 1700's in the Lutheran Church.
The Reformed wing of the Protestant church in Switzerland
developed quite differently. Calvin did not allow the use of instruments
or the creation of original song lyrics in public worship, and limited
music to the a cappella, congregational singing of the 150 psalms
in the Old Testament. By about 1550, the Geneva Psalter (all the Psalms
set to western tunes and meters) was created and in use. British and
North American Protestant churches largely followed Calvin's example
and, from 1550 to 1700, sang metrical psalms.
Around the year 1700 Issac Watts began to write excellent,
original hymn lyrics in the English language. It took about 75 years
for original hymns to receive widespread acceptance in Britain and
North America. Gradually hymns supplanted metrical psalms. Around
1850 the Gospel song, an evangelistic or witness song with a basic
salvation message and a catchy refrain, came into being. Used in Evangelistic
Crusades, they gradually became popular in evangelical church services
(generally not mainline churches) around 1875. Their popularity grew
until they were given virtually equal status with traditional hymns
in Evangelical churches in North American.
Around 1970 the worship chorus came into being through
the "Jesus People" of the 1960's. Today the use of worship choruses
has supplanted the use of hymns or gospel songs in a growing number
of churches. Our English Protestant heritage, to review, then, begins
with metrical psalms (1550), and proceeds to hymns (1700), gospel
songs (1850), and continues today with the advent of worship choruses
(1970). All four of these forms can perform valuable functions in
our services, but each church will need to decide how much weight
to give each of them.