|
On-line Supplement Ch2:
Teaching, the Spirit, &
Our Congregational Songs
Let the word of Christ richly dwell within you, with all wisdom
teaching and admonishing one another with psalms and hymns and spiritual
songs, singing with thankfulness in your hearts to God. Colossians
3:16 NASB, emphasis added
There are two sections to this supplement.
Section A contains student feedback. College students answered
three questions relating to chapter two of The New Worship. The responses
indicate their level of thinking and awareness. The questions could
provide an interesting discussion topic for your worship team, youth
group, or Sunday School class.
Section B offers wider perspectives on the history of spiritual
songs, and more information on the practice by some of singing in the
Spirit.
A. Student Feedback on Chapter Two
Question 1. Is worship becoming a privatized experience among teenagers
and college students? Do you have a good balance of singing to the Lord
and to one another (songs that admonish) in your home church?
Singing in churches today is concentrated on self-edification. The
focus is always on the individual and his experience with God and has
very little to do with the rest of the body. Everyone is so involved
with themselves and their own experience with God that they couldn't
care less, and would probably prefer to be isolated in a room by themselves.
I see many college students sitting with their eyes closed. It seems
as if they are blocking out the people around them and focusing in on
whatever it is that they want to do by themselves in their own private
time of worship.
A room full of people with their eyes closed tight singing on their
own reflects how privatized worship has gotten among young people.
Teenagers and college students make worshiping God a more personal
issue than any other age group. They seem to crave that state of bliss
when one worships God wholeheartedly. Older people, however, seem to
realize that God is worthy, no matter what you feel emotionally. I like
this approach better because I'm disturbed to hear some young people
say that a particular service wasn't good because they didn't cry or
feel anything special. This is something that we should warn the young
people in our church against.
Most students in worship services go to fulfill a need that they feel
inside. Songs are often written with the words "show me," "lead me,"
instead of "show us," "lead us."
Worship has become about the individual, about how "I" feel and about
what "I" get out of it. The concept of worshiping as a body and not
an individual was completely foreign to me until I came to Biola.
When I worship it is usually an independent thing and I would like
it to be more of a community thing. I would like to worship more as
a group, but I have no idea how.
I agree that worship is not only meant to glorify God, but also made
to encourage and build up other believers. This idea was simply never
brought to my attention before.
The whole concept of songs that admonish is new to me. I would not
know where to even begin to start using songs that "admonish" others.
I really don't know what singing to one another would look like or
how it would happen. When I sing, it is between me and God, hence very
private.
I can't think of any songs specifically focused toward admonishing
each other. Are there many songs that admonish? Where can we find such
songs?
I don't exactly believe that you have to literally sing to one another,
but we should recognize that we are worshiping as the body of Christ
and not just as individuals.
Question 2. Write out the lyric of two popular choruses--one with
a strong teaching function and the other with a weak teaching function.
Explain the rationale for your choice.
This might be a good question or assignment for a youth
group. A good discussion could ensue. I was disappointed in the answers
of a number of students, however. A third of the class could not identify
a chorus with a strong teaching function. Here are two student answers
(in their own words), one making an inadequate contrast and another
making a judicious contrast.
Student #1
[I find this student's contrasting examples inadequate]
Example of weak teaching function:
Humble thyself in the sight of the Lord (2x)
And He shall lift you up, higher and higher
And he shall lift you up, up into heaven
And he shall lift you up.
(Bud Hudson, 1978 Maranatha! Music)
Student rationale. "Humble Thyself" is taken directly from Scripture,
it does not give the reason for humbling yourself.
Example of a strong teaching function:
Oh, Lord, You gaze into my heart
like looking through a glass house.
Though Lord, you see through the darkest part,
still Lord, You love me
And I know You're thinking of me.
I must confess I just don't understand,
but I rely on your love like the flower needs the rain
I rely on your love through the storms and through the pain.
I rely on your love to free me from my chains
It's like the sun shining down from above
I rely on your love. I rely on your love.
(Greg Fadness, 1994 Downey Song)
Student rationale. This chorus gives a reason for dependence on God
in the verse section of the song.
Student #2
[I find this student's examples strongly contrasting.]
A popular chorus that is sung today that has a weak theological message
is "Make a Joyful Noise." The song goes like this:
Make a joyful noise, unto the Lord
Make a joyful noise, unto the Lord
Make a noise! (3x)
Make a joyful, joyful, joyful, joyful, joyful.
(waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!) noise.
Student rationale. This has a weak theological message because it says
absolutely nothing about God's character. It encourages us to be happy
and make noises accordingly, but it teaches us almost nothing. This
song is fun, upbeat, and easy to remember, making singers feel good,
but it certainly does not teach or admonish.
A second chorus that is sung today has a stronger theological
message, "Child of God."
Your life laid down, crucified
Arms stretched out and open wide
You rescued me so I could be a child of God
From nail-pierced hand and thorn-pierced brow
Your blood flows down to me somehow
And cleanses me so that I can be a child of God.
Praise to the Lamb that was slain
Praise to the Father, who gave his son away
You traded all to take my place
And died for me so I could be a child of God.
Student rationale. This song talks about the crucifixion of Christ,
the grace and love of God, and other topics. It does not simply repeat
a simple phrase over and over, but tells a powerful story about how
Christ's blood cleanses us. Most of the time hymns are the songs that
teach a stronger theological message, but this chorus does a fairly
good job.
Question 3. Is worship a means of being filled with the Spirit? Have
you experienced this personally? Share.
Students focused mostly on their experience rather than
the biblical support for being filled with the Spirit by means of worship.
I have personally experienced the filling of the Spirit. It was a time
that was so intimate. I completely opened up my entire being to him,
and he sent his Holy Spirit down upon me and filled my entire being.
I believe that this happened because during worship, I completely surrendered
myself to him and allowed him to do whatever he wanted to do. It was
incredible!! Like nothing I had ever experienced.
There was a particular time when His presence was so strong and convicting
I got down on my knees and broke down before Him. Focused on the Spirit,
I had not paid any attention to what the rest of the congregation was
doing, but when I "came out," it turned out that the Lord had been doing
similar things all throughout the church. I believe the Holy Spirit
is particularly present in worship--after all, He himself said that
He dwells in the praises of His people!
I think this question depends on what is believed by "filled with the
Spirit." I believe that we are always filled with the Spirit (if we
are saved). Too much emphasis is placed on the "feelings" of worship.
People believe that when they worship they need to have a "warm" feeling
to be filled with the Spirit.
Every time I truly meditate on the words and really mean what I am
singing to God, the Holy Spirit had led me in examining my heart. I
am reminded of who God is and what He has done for me out of sheer love.
When you sing the words to the Lord, you can have feelings of unbelievable
peace that can only come from the Lord. When I was singing a song about
heaven, I broke down emotionally. The song made me realize how unworthy
I was. The Holy Spirit filled my life and made me realize how prideful
I can be.
The most significant time was at my college group winter retreat. The
words of the speaker were in my head but didn't really pierce my heart
until we entered into a time of prayer. I could not feel it until the
praise team began to sing a song from John 16:13, "He Loves Me" by Tommy
Walker. As I started to sing "No greater love...." tears began to pour
from my face as He revealed a glimpse of His unending love for me.
Absolutely, worship is a means of being filled with the Spirit. The
Lord came upon Elisha when the harpist came. I believe that is still
the case today.
Yes, I definitely think that worship is a time when we are more aware
of the Spirit within us. But I believe we have the Spirit within us
always, not just during the worship.
For this question I don't have a lot to say, but I hope that I could
have this kind of experience soon.
Worship is most definitely a means of being filled with the Spirit
(Acts 4:31; Isaiah 57:19 NIV). About two weeks ago, I entered chapel
feeling spiritually poor and downcast. As we began to sing about the
holiness and love of God, the Lord poured the peace which passes understanding
into my soul. He broke my heart as He opened my eyes and made me aware
of His glory. I was so enamored and awe struck with the glory of God
that it took my breath away. Due to the intensity of His presence, my
eyes were filled with tears, which rolled over my cheeks and streamed
down my face to the point where I could not longer sing. I reveled in
the glory of God as His presence overflowed into my soul. I entered
chapel spiritually poor and left spiritually rich with the blessed assurance
that God was and is love.
It is my understanding that when Paul talks about the filling of the
Spirit he is talking about being controlled by the Spirit. The filling
of the Spirit can be misconstrued by some to think that Christians can
come to a worship service and get "charged up" with the Spirit. However,
I do not want to devalue worship as a means for us to drawn closer to
God or feel his presence more keenly.
If you get lost in worship and pour out your heart to God in a personal
way, "being filled with the Spirit" comes naturally.
Worshiping God through songs is the time that I most feel God speaking
to me.
I often experienced being filled with the Spirit during worship. When
I was young, I often wept without knowing why. My heart was overwhelmed
by a greater power, which sometimes brought joy into my heart, and other
times took doubt from me and granted me relief. I believe these experiences
were the power of the Spirit since only God can grant us authentic joy
and peace. As I grew up, I experienced less emotional flows like that,
but I still am being filled with the Spirit often.
I firmly believe worship is a means of being filled with the Spirit.
It is that feeling of being overwhelmed with a new understanding of
what is going on. I came to a new understanding of what my calling was,
of suddenly knowing what God was trying to tell me for a while.
Worship plays a very important role in the spirit-filled life. The
more we open ourselves to God, the more the Spirit can fill us. The
only danger I see is that sometimes people mistake emotional experiences
from singing songs with being filled with the Holy Spirit.
I think that worship is one of the primary ways we are filled with
the Spirit. I become so focused on God that everything fades away and
I truly enter into the presence of God. I feel more "real" at these
times than any other and things become very clear. It is in these times
that God has given me direction and confirmation about many things.
It's odd because often it is so unexpected.
I can remember worshiping God and suddenly feeling the presence of
God in an unusual way. I felt like shouting, crying, laughing, and running
away and hiding all at the same time. When this happens, I become aware
of my own sinfulness and wretchedness and God's infinite love, grace,
and mercy. The Holy Spirit makes me aware of areas of my life that need
to change. I have never had any prophetic experiences but I know that
my experiences are purely the work of the Holy Spirit.
I was at a point in my life where sin had crippled me and I was almost
lost in the darkness. A song was being sung and I couldn't help my tears.
I didn't sing but I listened and watched others and saw how happy they
were. They were filled with the joy of the Lord and I wanted to lay
down my sins for that joy.
When I think of worship, I think of the Spirit being there with you,
not necessarily anything earth shattering. Having the Spirit "take over,"
no I have not experienced that.
I believe that once you accept Christ, you get all of the Spirit all
at once. The experience that sometimes comes with worship is the feeling
of letting Christ have all of you, not having more of Christ.
One time while I was worshiping, God revealed to me something extremely
troublesome about another sister in the church. Through this spirit-filled
worship, God led me to comfort her and help her overcome her sin. Without
that time of being filled with the Spirit, I would have never have had
the gift of intuition to help that individual.
It is a mistake to assess spirituality simply on the basis of a person's
emotional display. What you want to be careful of is looking around
at people in the church service and seeing people really into it--on
their knees, people singing with glazed-over eyes, people expressing
a lot of emotion, people weeping--and drawing the conclusion that because
people are responding emotionally that they have a deeper connection
with God or a more mature faith than the person who is not reacting
emotionally at all. This is a profound error.
The first time worship really took root in my life was on a missions
trip to Mexico in my junior year of high school. In the dirt of Mexico
among thousands of believers, I came to know what it truly means to
worship God. In those moments I was the closest to God that I have ever
been. I saw my depravity and my weakness, which was truly the working
of the Spirit. It was one of the most amazing experiences ever. It is
my prayer that more people will see the power of worship and experience
being filled with the Spirit.
B. Additional Perspectives
[Here is some material that I didn't have space for
in the expanded edition of The New Worship. More historical background
is offered, a greater variety of views is furnished, and "singing in
the spirit" is addressed.]
The meaning of "Psalms," "Hymns," and "Spiritual Songs"
In the expanded edition of The New Worship I mentioned that most scholars
believe that precise differentiation of the terms "psalms," "hymns,"
and "spiritual songs" is not possible. Here are some additional facts.
No early Christian treatise on ecclesiastical music has survived. The
earliest full text we have of an extra-biblical Christian hymn (a hymn
not quoted in Scripture) is dated around A.D. 200.1 Not until
about A.D. 560 are there substantial descriptions of Christian liturgy
and its music, although Saint Ignatius of Antioch (d. 110), Tertullian
(d. 220), Clement of Alexandria (d. 212), and Augustine (d. 430) talk
much about music practice in their time.2
What sources did early Christian music draw on? Answer: popular Greek
idioms. Scholars believe that Christian music developed not from classical
Greek music, but from a freer, less strictly metered popular Greek idiom
that developed during the fourth century B.C.3 Apparently, the
early Christians also improvised much of their chant: "The church Fathers
gave a surprising amount of attention, in music and worship, to improvisation
and charismatic utterance . . . [and] spontaneity in prayer."4
Early church father Tertullian wrote: "Anyone who can, either from holy
Scripture or from his own heart, is called into the middle to sing to
God."
In contrast to my presentation in the expanded edition, Egon Wellesz,
an authority on music of this period, holds to the three forms argument-that
the forms were stylistically differentiated. Based on a study of early
Jewish music and later recorded Christian chant--not the textual usage
of the words "psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs"--he views the terms
the following way:
-
Psalmody: the cantillation of the Jewish psalms and
of the canticles and doxologies modeled on them.
-
Hymns: songs of praise of a syllabic type, i.e., each
syllable is sung to one or two notes of the melody.
-
Spiritual songs: Alleluia and other chants of a jubilant
or ecstatic character, richly ornamented.5
That is, Wellesz believes that the psalms probably refer to unmetered
psalms and their early church derivatives that reflect the parallelism
inherent in Old Testament materials. The hymns were likely syllabic
(one note for each syllable)-more like our hymns. They were probably
Christological expressions, similar to hymnic passages in Paul's letters
that show evidence of Greek poetic patterns (see Phil. 2:6-11; 1 Tim.
3:16).
Moreover, it has also been suggested that the designation "psalms,
hymns, and spiritual songs" may reflect a Trinitarian emphasis: psalms
were addressed to God, hymns to Christ the Son, and spiritual songs
were spontaneous expressions under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.
Arro holds a view similar to Wellesz, believing that psalms, hymns,
and spiritual songs reflect the three influences that shaped early Christianity-Judaism,
Hellenism, and the Asiatic Near East region-and bases his judgment on
the "subsequent course of history, not on a strict literary interpretation
of St. Paul's terms."6
Tracing the History of "Spiritual Songs"
Research has produced evidence regarding the meaning of "spiritual
songs" that may seem strange, perhaps even touching a sensitive chord
in readers.
"Spiritual songs" may have a more focused meaning than many evangelicals
might think. Many scholars relate it to glossolalia, to the influence
of mystical traditions, and in a later development, to the jubilus in
Catholic chant. For example, Jewish scholar Eric Werner links "spiritual
songs" to the synagogue and to "the glossolaly of the Paulinian age."
And Ford and Hardy relate them to mystical traditions in Eastern culture.7
Moreover, some musicologists believe "spiritual songs" relates to the
development of improvised songs on a single word like alleluia. The
Greek phrase for "spiritual songs" is odaes pneumaticaes or "pneumatic
odes"-that is, "songs upon the breath."8 What could "songs upon
the breath" mean? Egon Wellesz relates "spiritual songs" to improvisation.
He says improvising on a single word like alleluia was common practice
in Near East cultures during the time of Christ and later became formalized
in the jubilus of the Catholic mass. The final syllable ("ah") of the
word alleluia was prolonged in a kind of wordless improvisation.
Jerome and Augustine spoke of the practice. Saint Jerome (c. 347-420)
described it as neither "words nor syllables nor letters nor speech."
Saint Augustine said of it:
It is a certain sound of joy without words .
. . it is the expression of a mind poured forth with joy. . . . A man
rejoicing after certain words which cannot be understood, bursteth
forth into sounds of exultation without words so that it seemeth that
he . . . filled with excessive joy cannot express in words the subject
of that joy (italics added).9
When Augustine referred to "words which cannot be understood" or songs
"without words," he might have been speaking of simple improvisation
or some kind of ecstatic expression similar to that mentioned in the
Old Testament (1 Sam. 10:5-6; 16:13-14, 23) or even the "singing in
the spirit" occurring in the Corinthian church (1 Cor. 14:1-3). The
non-charismatic Jewish scholar, Werner, says,
In church and Synagogue, extended melismatic chant was
regarded as an ecstatic praise. . . . I venture to put forward my own
conviction that the whole concept of the pure, wordless, melismatic
jubilation should be considered the last, jealously guarded remnant
of an organized musical form of glossolaly.10
Edie Ensley says the improvised jubilus persisted in the worship of
Francis of Assisi, Bernard of Clairvaux, and Thomas Aquinas, dying out
only in the sixteenth century.11
In reference to singing in the spirit, these verses come to mind:
For if I pray in a tongue, my spirit prays, but my mind
is unfruitful. So what shall I do? I will pray with my spirit, but I
will also pray with my mind; I will sing with my spirit, but I will
also sing with my mind. 1 Corinthians 14:14-15
Performing "Spiritual Songs" Today
Is any counterpart to this spontaneous praise being practiced today?12
Yes. Liturgical and non-liturgical evangelical churches occasionally
employ improvised praise as a brief "coda" at the end of choruses for
ten to thirty seconds. I've heard this performed inoffensively in Lutheran
and Foursquare churches. Moreover, some Assembly of God churches "sing
in the spirit" for one to two minutes as a regular part of their Sunday
morning service.
Even in Assembly of God practice, however, there is nothing necessarily
"supernatural" about it. Many simply improvise alleluias and other short
phrases a cappella over a sustained instrumental drone or chord.13
The triad tends to emerge.14 One can hear neighbor and passing
tones and free material in the cloud-like textures that arise. Since
I improvise, one Sunday I felt free to join in-humming the drone and
sometimes singing alleluias or short "I thank you, Lord" or "I bless
you" phrases.
The total effect did not smack of a "fervor gone wild." In fact, what
I heard was peaceful and reverential, more like the strumming of many
harps. Choruses like "Give Thanks" lend themselves to this kind of treatment.
Sing it as written; at the end allow some free singing; then return
to the melody to close off.15 Moreover, prayer of this kind is
widespread in Latin American and Asian churches and is not perceived
by them as charismatic. Usually the leader rounds off this exercise
with a spoken prayer. Prayer is closely tied in to the whole concept
of "spiritual song."
A known melody can also be used for the basis of spontaneous song.
The congregation can sing their own verses to the chorus "Allelulia,"
for example. Or chord progressions, each four beats long with a pedal
tone (C, G, F, G over a pedal C), are also possible. Repeat as long
as necessary.
I have also heard instrumentalists do an exclusively instrumental
free improvisation after a worship chorus at Vineyard churches. The
progressions I-ii-V-IV (repeat) and I-bVII-bVI-bVII (repeat) can be
employed. This too can be a meaningful expression of worship.
For many churches, however, this form may not be appropriate because
it could be divisive. It is valuable, though, to become aware of its
various manifestations. The rationale of wedding the spontaneous with
the spiritual seems to lie behind the form. But remember, spontaneity
in worship doesn't make us more spiritual than another group.
If any aspect of this presentation interests you, don't rush or force
implementation. Allow ample time for the people to adjust. You might
want to consider having your worship group (instrumental or vocal) model
the shorter, coda version as an introductory step. If the form becomes
familiar and comfortable to all, then invite the people to join in.
Viewed in this light, Colossians 3:16 definitely gives us a richness
to think about! A whole book could be written just on this concept of
"psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs."
Moreover, this chapter does not address at all the singing and chanting
of psalms, though this is a tremendous area for development. With imagination,
the chanting of psalms can fit with your unique music style. It can
be done.
I don't want you to think of art as
a little whipped cream on the cake of life.
It's more like steak and potatoes.
Dallas Willard
Endnotes
-
John S. Andrews, "Hymns," in The International Dictionary
of the Christian Church, ed. J. D. Douglas (Grand Rapids: Zondervan,
1974), 494 ff.
-
Andrews, "Music in the Early Christian Church," in
The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians,. ed. Stanley Sadie,
1980, vol. 4., 363-4.
-
Andrews, "Music in the Early Christian Church," 365.
-
Andrews, "Music in the Early Christian Church," 364.
-
Egon Wellesz, "Early Christian Music," The New Oxford
History of Music, vol. 2 (London: Oxford University Press, 1954),
2. This judgment has been disputed by Heinrich Schlier (p. 363).
-
Andrews, "Music in the Early Christian Church," 363.
-
Daniel W. Hardy and David F. Ford, Praising and Knowing
God (Philadephia: Westminister Press, 1985), 59.
-
Donald P. Hustad, Jubilate II: Church Music in the
Evangelical Tradition (Carol Stream, Ill.: Hope Publishing Co., 1993),
148.
-
Migne XXXVII, 1271; Nicene & Post-N, Ser. 1, VIII,
488. Quoted in Gustave Reese, Music in the Middle Ages, 64.
-
Eric Werner, The Sacred Bridge (New York: Schocken
Books, 1970), 59. The term melismatic refers to the use of more than
two pitches per syllable.
-
Edie Ensley, Sounds of Wonder (New York: Paulist 1977),
105. See also the chapter by George H. Williams "A History of Speaking
in Tongues and Related Gifts" in the Charismatic Movement, ed. Michael
P. Hamilton (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1975).
-
See the music journal The Hymn, January 1987, for
informative articles on Pentecostal music and singing in the Spirit
by Donald Hustad ("The Historical Roots of Music in the Pentecostal
and Neo-Pentecostal Movements"), Larry T. Duncan ("Music Among Early
Pentecostals"), Paul Wohlgemuth ("Praise Singing"), and Calvin M.
Johansson ("Singing in the Spirit: The Music of Pentecostals"). I
am indebted to this issue for this supplement.
-
For example, a fifth, D-A, in the key of D.
-
Here, D, F#, A.
-
The Trinity Lutheran Church in San Pedro, California,
(Paul Anderson, former pastor) performs "Give Thanks" this way
|